Talk:Corporate raid

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Examples

The article list an example of "an insurance company whose "float" or "reserves" are larger than the market cap", but Float can never be more than the Market capitalization of a company. Float is a part of a company's market cap, it can be at best equal to but is often less than the market cap. If the statement could somehow be true, it would mean that float is not referencing corporate securities but something specific to the insurance, if that is the case it should noted. Also the examples would be clearer if they were in separate sentences or rewritten. WikipedianYknOK 19:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, I've reworded it.--DMCer (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second paragraph of "Analysis" should be removed

Every sentence of the second paragraph starts with weasel words (Some say..., Others say..., etc.) without a single reference. That whole paragraph should either be removed or cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.125.45.10 (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to Media References

There is no mention of one of the best and most well-known films on corporate raiding, Barbarians at the Gate (1993), which is surprising to me as it was my introduction to the subject. Wall Street was a little bit before my time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.231.88 (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article fails to explain its subject. How does a corporate raid make money?

I'm unfamiliar with the stock market, and, after reading this article, I don't understand what a corporate raid is, or how anyone would make money executing one. The article makes several references to individual raiders and raids without explaining how much money was made or how that money was generated. The clearest explanation seems to come in the description of Gordon Gekko, who buys companies whose assets are worth more than the cost of a controlling share and then sells those assets. Is this what corporate raiding is about? If so, that information belongs in the head of the article. Furthermore, the history section is well populated but poorly explained. Many events purported to be "corporate raids" are listed, but the essence of what makes these buyouts "raids" is quite unclear, aside from the general sense that the raid was contrary to the interest of the corporation. It would be useful if, for at least a few of the raids listed, the following information were provided: why was the company targeted, what were the raider's objectives, were those objectives accomplished and with what result, and how the corporation in question came out of it. Flies 1 (talk) 15:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corporate raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121150300/http://www.stlmag.com/media/St-Louis-Magazine/October-2005/TWA-Death-Of-A-Legend/ to http://www.stlmag.com/media/St-Louis-Magazine/October-2005/TWA-Death-Of-A-Legend/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]