Talk:Siskiyou County, California

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Old West / U.S. counties Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

How To

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

Missing info?

A lot of the info seems out of date. The section "Cities by population and crime rates" is to be missing a header row. The "click to expand" feature for data charts seems quirky, is there a reason to use it? Enri999 (talk) 01:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

moving images

Thanks for the info about 800x600 screens. I'm going to move the Mossbrae image closer to the reference to waterfalls. Let me know if it causes any readability problems in the new location. NorCalHistory 04:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MESSAGE FOR NORCALHIST - Man, I DO love that picture of Shasta being at the top of the article, as I also love seeing the mountain IRL whenever I get the chance to get up that way. However, I've noticed that having it there kind of cramps the TOC off to the right, that's why I had moved it down and tabled it in with the Adjacent Counties list. I checked it in 800x600, and it does the same thing, even worse. (I operate in 1020x768, so I have to reset my rez whenever I do these checks..) I'm gonna hesitate moving it back this time, until I can get some feedback from you on your thoughts about this one. (Co-op mode!) I'll give it about a week, then re-adjust if I haven't heard anything, so we can move forward with the article. Edit Centric 17:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, the TOC box creates a lot of dead space at the top of most articles - valuable space that, it turns out can be filled with visual information! Here, the TOC is there and available for anyone to use (it's a pretty short article so I expect the TOC use is minimal), but more importantly, all that valuable eyeball real estate up there is not blank! NorCalHistory 18:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very true, and your opinion does connect with mine on the whitespace. On the flipside of the coin, I'd like to see the article grow a bit, so the TOC will be of more importance. Also, for the sake of uniformity (lends a modicum of credence to an otherwise beleaguered reference site,) and consistency, the TOC should be present in the same location on each page. Given that the user can always hide the TOC if he or she wishes, it aides in ease of use to always have it there on the left-alignment. BY THE WAY!! Maybe you can help with this, many of the Info boxes on each county page are missing the county seal(s). As I create each info box, I'm using a template from Imperial County, and then filling in and changing the info to reflect the county that it is being applied to, which is leaving some dead or erroneous links to county seal graphics that do not exist by that name. Any ideas? Edit Centric 01:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Siskiyou County, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

South Township

There is a South Township in the 1860, 1870 and 1880 US Census for Siskiyou County, but I haven't been able to find a document referencing this place on Google to use as a citation on Wikipedia. Since we're not allowed to use original research here, such a source is required. The 1860 Census record I viewed said the local post office was Callahans, which I gather was Callahan's Ranch, established as a post office in 1858 and became Callahan in 1892. The 1870 Census record noted the post office in Etna, and the 1880 record was simply South Twp. There should be either a South Township article or a redirect set up to point to whatever municipality South Twp became, seems to me. Pnoble805 (talk) 01:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]