Jump to content

Talk:Antimony

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAntimony has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 6, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 5, 2023Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Leaching Source

[edit]

The leaching source seems to be partially from this source: http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/press/news/news06/2601antime.html although the URL does not mention the results that are currently in this article.

Microelectronics use

[edit]

The article indicates that antimony is used in tiny amounts in the semiconductor industry. As a dopant perhaps, but it is roughly 50% by weight of the semiconductor indium antimonide (InSb) used in infrared detectors.

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: All issues fixed. 141Pr {contribs/Best page} 17:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a GA from 2012. There are lots of uncited material which needs to be cited. I've gone head and added some {{Citation needed}} tags. 141Pr 20:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Medicine section doesn't make sense

[edit]

The article first claims that antimony based medicines are the "drug of choice" for Lesihmanisis infections, then goes on to say all the ways how said medicines are very flawed at treating this disease. This seems to be contradicting itself EdwinAmi (talk) 20:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't access the source, but I have swapped in a more recent reference. No information about your question, however. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 13:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]