Talk:Infoganda
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Us vs. them
[edit]It seems like use is more like "Propoganda" is done by "them" (The communists, the Koreans, the germans etc.) and Infoganda is "Propoganda" done by our side "US Government"
- The idea is that it is propoganda in a infomercial format. Who does it doesn't matter. The infomercial format is key; the sales techniques used on infomercials is consistent and distinct from other forms of sales methods.
User:justanyone|user talk:justanyone weds 5 may 2004 3:40 pm cdt
Cleanup
[edit]This article has problems. The wording is composed of too much unencyclopedic prose currently; I buy relevance, but we have some original research, weasel words, awkward sentences, lack of citations, etc, etc. It needs a good cleanup and citation. I doubt a rewrite will be necessary, but shortening for brevity would help, too. Also, link it out where relevant (seriously lacking backlinks). 65.112.197.16 01:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American television articles
- Mid-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Mid-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles