Talk:Mutha's Day Out
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This page was submitted by me, LoyalMDOFan. Enjoy. This band needs to reunite.
This article needs a lot of NPOVing. 66.60.159.190 03:19, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I have improved it as far as I can. I have as much information as I can at this point. And why did you get rid of the lyrics I worked on FOR HOURS?! I can't improve them any better to my knowledge, so if you have a problem, you can just leave. What exactly needs improving anyway? Let me know.
- MDOFan, I looked over the article briefly and it does need to be cleaned up and "wikified", i.e. formatted to adhere to Wikipedia's style guidelines and linked to other articles. It does have some POV problems but nothing too severe. These problems include saying the songs have good messages, the album was a strong debut, calling their shows "legendary", and the "hopefully" statement at the end. I'll remove these remarks. Please remember that none of this is intended as an insult to you or the band - we simply try to present things objectively here. Also, removing comments from talk pages is against the rules. Please don't do that any more. Rhobite 23:19, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page has way too many subheadings and way too much POV. Bungopolis 03:29, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem too bad to me. Do you have specific examples of POV problems? Rhobite 05:05, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]It's true that these guys may not meet WP:MUSIC. However, instead of speedy, I think it's sensible to redirect the tons of various articles related to this back to the main article, then put the main up on Afd if people really think it should go away. Friday (talk) 04:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
AFD debate link
[edit]This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Mutha'sDayOut.jpg
[edit]Image:Mutha'sDayOut.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.