Talk:Joyce Maynard

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

What about Maynard's book Baby Love? - bbh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.130.151.198 (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is obviously written by Maynard herself. Isn't there some sort of policy against this? --75.137.185.150 (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Balance and completion?

I've flagged for POV, because of numerous unsubstantiated claims. Joyce Maynard wrote posts about herself in disguise? Where? A single New York Times piece "ironically provided Maynard with a greater readership than ever before"? Considering her own novel had just become a Nicole Kidman movie, I sincerely doubt that. Cites for these are more are very much needed.

Also, as written this seems to be missing several of her books. If anyone has the time, could they fill out the bibliography? -- P L E A T H E R _talk 16:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

" She had numerous affairs; one of her former boyfriends called her "the most self-obsessed person I've ever met. She gives narcissism a bad name."

This would seem to violate BLP policy even though it is sourced. NewJerseyLiz ^{Let's Talk} 18:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it. Seems like gossip from an unnamed person.--Canoe1967 (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Canoe1967. It seemed inappropriate. I think the remarks about her adoption is quite catty as well. I don't mean to whitewash and present a perfect portrait of Maynard but this information doesn't seem very valuable since the adoption only lasted two years. Liz ^{Let's Talk} 21:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I already found early text that explains this development in her personal life in a more neutral way. Liz ^{Let's Talk} 21:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome.--Canoe1967 (talk) 03:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Joyce Maynard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100115101551/http://www.joycemaynard.com:80/Joyce_Maynard/WRITING_WORKSHOPS.html to http://www.joycemaynard.com/Joyce_Maynard/WRITING_WORKSHOPS.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking up with Salinger

I've been thinking about what sort of information should be in an encyclopedia entry, as opposed to a book review, a magazine or newspaper article, an academic essay, or a TV interview with Oprah.

Although entries like this one are are called "biography" entries, they're not really biographies. They are not nearly as detailed, analytical, or probing. They don't have to tell a story, and probably shouldn't. They are not really meant to be a summary of a person's life. Therefore the information needs to be less personal rather than more. I'm also mindful of what the documentation says about privacy, particularly in Biographies of Living Persons. Err on the side of privacy. Better to have less info rather than more.

I've been reading, again, the book Salinger by Shields and Salerno, which is the most complete published account of Salinger that exists. It would be speculation on my part to say with certainty the cause of Maynard's departure from Salinger's home. It was a complicated situation, far too complicated to know from the outside. Regardless, these are matters beyond the concern of an encyclopedia editor, who need only say that the relationship ended.

--Vmavanti (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joyce Maynard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140110225048/http://www.umanitoba.ca/libraries/archives/collections/complete_holdings/ead/html/maynard.shtml to http://www.umanitoba.ca/libraries/archives/collections/complete_holdings/ead/html/maynard.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link

Broken link under External links: * "Why Does the American Press Hate Joyce Maynard?" by Jules Siegel (Book Arts) Alanasings (talk) 19:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]