Talk:Sequential (company)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Product list
[edit]The section Sequential (company)#Product list clearly ignore the important products of the company listed on [1]. It seems a kind of vandalism. We need accurate article without intentional obfuscation. --Clusternote (talk) 15:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please be careful when accusing other editors of vandalism.
- It isn't vandalism to remove content from articles based on Wikipedia policy. As I stated in my edit summary, the Wikipedia policies that apply here are WP:VERIFY (all information requires a high-quality source) and WP:INDISCRIMINATE (articles shouldn't just be context-free lists of stuff). Popcornfud (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Don't obfuscate the name field of citation tag <ref name="..."/>
[edit]Before the revision 1149486045 of this article, the name field of citation tag <ref/> had been unnaturally obfuscated as following:
- name=":0" —— Keyboard magazine (October 2018)
- name=":1" —— Keyboard magazine (June 2013)
- name=":02" —— FACT magazine in 2017
- name=":2" —— FACT magazine in 2016
- name=":23" —— FACT magazine in 2016 (DUPLICATION of above!)
- name=":3" —— Dan Gentile's article in 2022
- name=":15" —— Peter Kirn's book in 2011
These obfuscations are inconvenient for other writers. Don't obfuscate these. --Clusternote (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- These aren't intentionally obfuscated. They are the product of using the Wikipedia Visual Editor, which auto-generates refnames numerically. The refnames can be easily replaced with the RefNamer tool. Popcornfud (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)