Talk:UN Trade and Development

International relations: United Nations Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

International development Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

There is this insistance of putting in this joke about the acronym ("under no cirumstance take any decisions"). While I personally find it funny, I don't see how it can qualify as an encyclopedic entry. Before re-inserting it, can those that insist on this make a documented reference to one or several news articles, with a url, that attribute the joke to someone that activiely participates in the work of UN organizations. To clarify somewhat, only UN agencies that are keepers of an international regime (such as the WTO - trade regime; WIPO - Intelectual Property regime; World Bank & IMF - international financial regime and the Security Council - Peace and Security Regime) or are funding Agencies (UNDP) actually take any kind of real decisions. UNCTAD is not in this category. --Modi 07:50, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I would like to clarify the last point to add that no UN agency is allowed to take legally binding decisions outside of the Security Council.

The WTO is not a member of the UN system, though the functioned for almost 50 years under UN auspice when the Havana Charter was not ratified by all parties, whereby the would-be Bretton Woods agency called the International Trade Organization came to function as the International Commission for the International Trade Organization (ICITO), which was commonly known as the GATT, or General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. WTO legal decisions are legally binding, whereas GATT panel decisions were not; most UN resolutions are not legally binding.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is a UN agency, but it has some unique characteristics, stemming from the fact that it, like the International Labour Office (ILO), predated the drafting of the UN Charter in 1945; WIPO origins return to the late 19th century when it operated as a consortia of countries working under the Berne and Paris treaties, which protected copyright, and protected technical designs. More recently, WIPO is one of the few agencies that earns money, by virtue of its business with international patents. A court with legally binding powers was founded in WIPO, to handle domain name site (DNS) disputes; one of the more famous of which was the case of Madonna Ciccone, who won back her name, madonna.com, from a domain name 'squatter'. The ILO also has the power to make legally binding decisions, in the form of the tri-partite court which addresses matters concerning employment of intergovernmental (UN) employees, as well as other matters.

The point is that the UN, even UNDP, does not take binding decisions; UNDP does have greater budgetary discretion, so it may appear that they are more empowered, but in legal terms, they remain subject to the wishes of the UN-member states. In this manner, UNCTAD is, as are the better part of most international organizations, more of an operating organ, than a decision-making entity. UNCTAD does issue recommendations, and it writes reports that are respected and used by many developing countries, most particularly in the areas of trade and investment (foreign direct investment, or FDI). It is a center of competence for development, trade and investment.

As a side point, the tendency to abuse acronyms is not unique to UNCTAD. The GATT used to be called the "General Agreement to Talk and Talk"

requires a "History" entry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.37.118 (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy up introduction

Would there be any objection if I re-ordered the opening section? It seems to ramble. Respublicans (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Future editors please note: http://unctad.org/en/Pages/About%20UNCTAD/A-Brief-History-of-UNCTAD.aspx Respublicans (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110511144047/http://www.undg.org/index.cfm?P=13 to http://www.undg.org/index.cfm?P=13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]