Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet santa
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 07:26, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Slang dic def that doesn't seem to be in use. All the google hits I've scanned are for coincidental pairings of the two words, not this usage. Niteowlneils 00:14, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Eew. Non-notable (thank goodness). --Merovingian (t) (c) (w) 06:37, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, slang dictionary definition. Megan1967 06:51, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete if possible. ComCat 08:45, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete speedily please, patent nonsense Jersyko 17:21, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and allow for organic decay. --GRider\talk 22:11, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as yet another one of those sick and totally unverifiable "practices" (putting it politely) that rear their ugly heads here every so often. Probably the same, uh, individual responsible for all the others. I'm biting my tongue here, friends, so I'll stop now... - Lucky 6.9 03:44, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Dubious neologism, possible prank article, at least unverifiable. -- Infrogmation 05:06, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: someone might want to delink this from the even less pleasant Dirty Sanchez. Kappa 11:09, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
No: Someon should expand on it though, because ive seen it done ... hilarious.
- Sock via 69.76.179.5. User's only edit. Surprise! - Lucky 6.9 06:03, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- delete i guess, even tho i helped edit it. Yuckfoo 06:30, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.