Talk:Agnostida
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Agnostids weren't cannibals
[edit]The hypothesis that Agnostids were cannibals did not appear in the peer reviewed literature. It was a talk at the anual GSA meeting. Talks at GSA don't go through any peer review process. Basically the idea is completely batshit insane. It doesn't deserve to be on the wikipedia page.
Systematic Position of Agnostids
[edit]I think that it is wise not to place whether agnostids are trilobites or crustaceomorphs in the heading of the article, and instead deal with the controversy in the text.
Size
[edit]What is the size range of these beasties? Also how many thoracic segements, typically? Stub Mandrel (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Agnostida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040407030239/http://www.aloha.net:80/%7Esmgon/ordagnostida.htm to http://www.aloha.net/~smgon/ordagnostida.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)