Talk:Psychosexual disorder

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Psychosexual disorder.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 26 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Miguellee15.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

from VfD:

This page is redundant with Paraphilia. It should be merged into that article if there's anything here worth saving. -- Beland 01:28, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Keep since both are valid names, but one should be a redir to the other. List this issue here: Wikipedia:Duplicate articles -- [[User:Davodd|DAVODD «TALK»]] 06:45, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
The content is patent nonsense. Redirect it now if need be, and be done with it. 129.94.6.28 06:46, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep and cleanup. Not quite the same thing as paraphilia although closely related. Agree it needs work. Andrewa 13:17, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Comment - Psychosexual more often refers to Freud's theory of psychosexual development. Darksun 18:28, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to paraphilia. — Gwalla | Talk 02:44, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Darksun is right: "psychosexual disorder" is 100% psychoanalysis, and Freudian to boot. The problem is that this article isn't about the Freudian theories and how they dominate(d) psychiatry. VfD is not the right place to ask for a rewrite, and Clean Up probably won't do it. Therefore, delete because a redirect is not on target: this topic is Freudianism, and redirecting it to the more behaviorist and descriptive paraphilia is a bit of a mislead. Geogre 13:14, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Rewrite to handle Geogre's concerns. If it's a notable concept in Freudian psychology, which I believe it is, then deleting it is a bad idea. I don't understand his objection to rewriting except that perhaps he thinks they won't do it correctly. --Improv 19:04, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
So I Googled around a bit, and this term appears to be in common use to refer to any sex-related psychological disorder. The content currently on this page is certainly already covered in Paraphilia, but if we are going to leave a redirect behind, I would actually recommend Sexual problems, which includes paraphilia and many other things listed by the DSM. It would not be inappropriate to include a note there about Freudian psychology and its theories and terminology of sexual disorder. But it's probably best to discuss those disorders somewhere other than under "Psychosexual disorder". -- Beland 04:03, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete The current contents comprise two paragraphs that don't say much. Psychosexual disorders could include an enormous amount of information. Paraphilia is just one small section of the area. For instance, premature ejaculation is a sexual disorder that is most certainly not a paraphilia although they could coexist. I have recently gone through creating DSM type categories and have included Category:Sexual and gender identity disorder which has 11 subcategories. There is currently not an article with that heading. I was wondering what to do with Category:paraphilia which seems a bit disorganised at present. It really should be a subcategory of sexual and gender identity disorder in addition to any other categories in which it belongs. --CloudSurfer 05:31, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep and improve - this is a complex and large field and deserves a better article than this. Intrigue 17:00, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Removing "O'Sullivan Syndrome"

I removed the sentence, "A classic example of such a disorder is 'O'Sullivan syndrome', in which the victim is overcome with a desire to fornicate with armed forces servicemen" as this is obviously bogus. A Internet search reveals no such syndrome. Someone obviously has inserted this in here to diss a woman with the surname O'Sullivan.Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 14:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]