User talk:Brhaspati

Image:Shrikhande graph.svg

Hello, this is a very nice image, but it seems to have some kind of blotch in the extreme bottom left corner. This is particularly visible in the article Shrikhande graph. Can this be removed? ssepp^(talk) 14:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh..it is a spider with 'pajek'. Is it really necessary? ssepp^(talk) 16:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply - I don't login regularly. I had created the image with Pajek, a graph-drawing program. I am uploading a new version of the SVG with the spider logo removed. -- Brhaspati\^talk/_contribs 18:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Hello, Brhaspati. I know you had altered the WWII map to fix problems with color-blindess. I thought you might also want to take a look at Image:WWI-re.png, which is essentially the same map with the same problem, for WWI. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 17:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining the problems with the colors. I didn't know what the specific problem was between the colors of the WWII map, so I assumed the WWI map had the same issue. In any case, I didn't create the WWII map, I just uploaded a correct version after the map had been changed in a controversial manner without the editor seeking consensus first, but that's another story. So no offense taken, I'm all for positive contributions to Wikipedia, whether I created something or not. I suppose all is well here then :) Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 04:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Beatles, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

Religion: "Two popes have been named after the Beatles: John Paul I and John Paul II. They were the first two popes with two names each. As of 2008, there have been no popes named George Ringo." Really funny, but it would be better in Uncyclopedia; you should have a look.--BeatlesProject (talk) 21:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Railways at FAR

Indian Railways has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured quality. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Muntadar al-Zaidi

I have nominated Muntadar al-Zaidi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muntadar al-Zaidi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nanonic (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 13th parallel north

I have nominated 13th parallel north, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13th parallel north. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cerejota (talk) 11:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Saarang.2005.orangestreet.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Saarang.2005.orangestreet.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is this bull? The second version from the page history clearly shows the permission to be Original image at Kiruba Shankar's blog. Copyright terms read "©1997 - 2004 Kiruba.com. Take whatever you want!". Except that this was changed by some user named Prasad ichal to point it to his own Picasa page which claims "all rights reserved". This is a matter to be sorted out between Prasad ichal and Kiruba Shankar. -- Brhaspati\^talk/_contribs 00:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unix history + colour-blindness

I've updated the image to make it prettier, but check it is still colour-blind-safe (I've check greyscale and it seems to be OK). Eraserhead1 (talk) 10:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graeco-Latin square

There's a discussion on the talk page of GLSquare about removing your nice big, huge, list of solutions to the problem. I'll suggest that it greatly be reduced, as two others have already. The problem is that this is the largest non-list, non-olympics article on Wikipedia, and yes, size does matter. In any case you are invited to join the discussion. Smallbones (talk) 12:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Smallbones (talk) 07:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Super King in IPL 2009 points table

please see the IPL 2009 discussion page. Rtyags (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Madras Tamil

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Madras Tamil. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madras Tamil. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pileup (disambiguation)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pileup (disambiguation), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Wikipedia:Pile-up. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bot is indeed confused, and I have cleared the false positives. --Brhaspati\^talk/_contribs 17:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure that you follow the instructions at WP:Copying within Wikipedia and WP:Splitting the next time you split an article. It's important that you provide attribution to the original creator of the text. Thanks, The leftorium 14:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Iitm.oat.scrn.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Iitm.oat.scrn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 23:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Chennai.ranganathanst.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai.ranganathanst.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mylapore.kapali.gopuram.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Mylapore.kapali.gopuram.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Culfest

The article Culfest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was flagged up in 07, and then in 09 - suggest deletion from RA - it has no future.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mark^Dask 18:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Indian Institute of Technology

Template:Infobox Indian Institute of Technology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. HairyWombat 23:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chennai.adyar.boating.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chennai.adyar.boating.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Iitm.maingate.logo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iitm.maingate.logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where da white women at

HAs been prodded on the basis that it is not a remotely plausible redirect.©Geni 17:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RANDU - Values Rendering

Hey Brhaspati, I'm David from Israel, and I have a small question for you.
I saw the image rendering the output of a RANDU number generator.
It says it's a Matlab plot done by you.

I was wondering if I could please have a copy of this Matlab file?
It is not for any commercial, or even academic purposes - only for the sake of trying, and messing with Matlab a bit.

Many thanks,
David
Dav!dB (talk) 10:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Iitm.icsr.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Iitm.icsr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for File:Iitm.oat.pit.jpg and File:Iitm.chemplast.pavilion.jpg. --Geniac (talk) 01:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deep Woods

The article Deep Woods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability issues. As a student of the college in question, I do no believe the fest is notable enough to merit its own article in Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. La Alquim ista 18:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deep Woods for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deep Woods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Woods until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. La Alquim ista 14:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FreeCAD (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on FreeCAD (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LittleWink (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moksha (Indian band)

The article Moksha (Indian band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources to indicate the subject's notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus ^(talk) 11:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion notice

Hello Brhaspati, Thank you very much for all your contributions to Wikipedia. Thanks again for creating article Parry's_Corner.

An article that you have been involved in editing, r.e.: Parry's_Corner, has been proposed for a merge with another article George_Town,_Chennai. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to Talk:George_Town,_Chennai#Merger_Discussion, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 2know4power (talk) 08:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello Brhaspati, Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia. By User: 2know4power (talk) 08:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential kids listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Presidential kids. Since you had some involvement with the Presidential kids redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential children listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Presidential children. Since you had some involvement with the Presidential children redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

King who died with a hot poker up the ass listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect King who died with a hot poker up the ass. Since you had some involvement with the King who died with a hot poker up the ass redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 07:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Apjak" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Apjak. Since you had some involvement with the Apjak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The set of all sets that do not contain themselves" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The set of all sets that do not contain themselves. Since you had some involvement with the The set of all sets that do not contain themselves redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. NineFiveSeven 18:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Spanish Casual Q&A" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spanish Casual Q&A. Since you had some involvement with the Spanish Casual Q&A redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Science it works bitches" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Science it works bitches. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 8#Science it works bitches until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 04:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Boston Misunderstanding" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Boston Misunderstanding. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 22#Boston Misunderstanding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Last idiot" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Last idiot and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 26#Last idiot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QuickQuokka ^[talk] 09:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The last idiot" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The last idiot and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 26#The last idiot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QuickQuokka ^[talk] 09:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Holey building" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Holey building and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 27#Holey building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 12:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Holy building" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Holy building and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 27#Holy building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 12:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Presidential pets" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Presidential pets and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 28#Presidential pets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 23:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yupia

The article Yupia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No such settlement exists according to https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation

The article Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:19, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]