User talk:Oqm4
Hello Oqm4, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Angela. 21:07, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
about "closet screenplay"
[edit]Hello! "The Girl in Harmagedon" is not a manga or an anime but a literary work written in screenplay form.See "Disscussion" of the article. From Hermes the Merchant (talk) 10:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I can't find any reference to this text on the web. Do you have the Japanese title, publisher information, ISBN -- anything like that? Oqm4 (talk)
- There may not be reference in English pages. But ,in Japanese Wikipedia,there's an article about that text . URL shown below will lead you to it.
- http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8F%E3%83%AB%E3%83%9E%E3%82%B2%E3%83%89%E3%83%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%91%E5%A5%B3
- Japanese title of the text is "Harumagedon No Shoujo (ハルマゲドンの少女)”. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermes the Merchant (talk • contribs) 02:36, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Publisher of the text is named "Tokuma Shoten".URLs shown below will lead you to Amazon's page.
- http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%83%8F%E3%83%AB%E3%83%9E%E3%82%B2%E3%83%89%E3%83%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%91%E5%A5%B3%E3%80%881%E3%80%89-%E3%83%88%E3%82%AF%E3%83%9E%E3%83%BB%E3%83%8E%E3%83%99%E3%83%AB%E3%82%BA-%E5%B9%B3%E4%BA%95-%E5%92%8C%E6%AD%A3/dp/4191538152
- http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%83%8F%E3%83%AB%E3%83%9E%E3%82%B2%E3%83%89%E3%83%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%91%E5%A5%B3%E3%80%88%E4%B8%8A%E3%80%89-%E5%B9%B3%E4%BA%95-%E5%92%8C%E6%AD%A3/dp/4191233696
- ISBN-10: 4191233696
- ISBN-13: 978-4191233690
- --Hermes the Merchant (talk) 17:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
I posted the text here for discussion: http://scriptjr.nl/issues/1.1/productions-dubious-advantage.php#comments Oqm4 (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Uga.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Uga.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT (416) 00:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Uga g.png)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Uga g.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Link to your movie script
[edit]Hi, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia; your input is much appreciated. However, I've removed the link to your movie script at Sunday Times Golden Globe Race, and I thought I should explain why.
Wikipedia has guidelines on Links normally to be avoided. Your link seems to be in trouble with the following guidelines:
- 1. Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article. (i.e. as far as I can tell, your link does not add any information or context.)
- 4. Links mainly intended to promote a website. See External link spamming.
- 6. Links to sites that require payment or registration to view the relevant content, unless the site itself is the subject of the article, or the link is a convenience link to a citation. See below.
- Advertising and conflicts of interest... You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked.
Basically Wikipedia frowns on self-promotion. See also Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
Of course, once your screenplay hits the big screen (and I wish you all the best), you can trust that someone will make an appropriate link to it. Cheers, and please keep contributing to Wikipedia. — Johan the Ghost seance 13:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Black mountain institute, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://blackmountain.unlv.edu. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Black mountain institute
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Black mountain institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 02:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Witness (magazine), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://witness.blackmountaininstitute.org/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Witness (magazine)
[edit]A tag has been placed on Witness (magazine) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alexius08 (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Witness (magazine), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://witness.blackmountaininstitute.org/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Witness (magazine)
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, Witness (magazine), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://witness.blackmountaininstitute.org/history.htm. As a copyright violation, Witness (magazine) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Witness (magazine) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Witness (magazine) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Witness (magazine) with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Witness (magazine).
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 21:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Diana L. Bennett Fellows Program, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://blackmountain.unlv.edu/programs/fellows.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Athens 1840.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Athens 1840.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
The article SCRIPT (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable brand-new journal.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 09:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of SCRIPT (journal)
[edit]I have nominated SCRIPT (journal), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCRIPT (journal). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Josh Parris 09:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Black Mountain Institute
[edit]A tag has been placed on Black Mountain Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OlYellerTalktome 17:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:BmiLogo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BmiLogo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Script journal logo.png listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Script journal logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
The article The Diana L. Bennett Fellows Program has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable program from "Institute" long deleted as promotional - see Black Mountain Institute.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)