Jump to content

Talk:Josef Matthias Hauer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Source

[edit]

from http://www.ibiblio.org/johncovach/hauerbio.htm by John Covach, see Wikipedia:Copyright problems Hyacinth (talk) 18 May 2004

Hauer and Mann

[edit]

I erased the following passage, there is no proof for it. "It has been found out that—besides Arnold Schönberg and Theodor W. Adorno—Hauer was also a model for Adrian Leverkühn in Thomas Mann's novel Doktor Faustus." --Konrad Stein (talk) 21:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Grove

[edit]

Since you didn't actually check The New Grove you can't actually claim to cite it first hand. Hyacinth (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One supposes you must be addressing someone in particular. Since I am the only editor lately to have made any change to do with Monika Lichtenfeld's New Grove article, it seems reasonable to suppose you might be speaking to me. Of course I actually checked Lichtenfeld's article. What do you want? A literal quotation? I can provide it, if you insist.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 05:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The page number you requested, which leads me to believe that, "of course," you did not check it. Hyacinth (talk) 06:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since it is not usual for dictionary or encyclopedia articles to cite page numbers (because articles in them are usually short and ordered alphabetically, so that citations are easily located), I do not normally write them down. However, some editors have recently started demanding them for New Grove articles, and I have tried to oblige by trekking over to the library and tracking them down. I have not yet had the opportunity in this case, but where on earth do you suppose I got the article author's name from, if not from a copy of the article itself?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me if I still don't understand. You requested a page number from yourself after looking at it? Hyacinth (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's right. I thought I would save others the trouble of demanding it of me.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 03:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But why don't you give it to yourself? Hyacinth (talk) 04:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, what, demand a page reference of myself? I thought I just explained that is exactly what I did.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 04:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, why don't you give the page number to yourself? Hyacinth (talk) 04:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was forced to go to the library, so I looked it up. Hyacinth (talk) 20:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Nomos" Image

[edit]

Instead of the "(for example Nomos, see image at twelve-tone technique)" link, I added the image of "Nomos" from the twelve-tone technique article. Starvinsky (talk) 02:04, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganization

[edit]

I also reorganized the material, and fixed a lot of syntactical errors. There are, however, still some questionable statements that could use both some clarification and citations. Starvinsky (talk) 02:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Josef Matthias Hauer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Josef Matthias Hauer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

[edit]

To add to this article: whether Schoenberg was aware of Hauer's work when he first developed his 12-tone method of composition, whether Schoenberg was influenced from Hauer to any extent, and whether Schoenberg acknowledged such influence from Hauer. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]