Talk:Rachel, Nevada

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Little A'Le'Inn was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 29 June 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rachel, Nevada. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

heh

Rick's original text read "UFO hunters visit Rachel to buy supplies before continuing on down the highway to try to catch activities at the top-secret United States Air Force base." I was tempted to follow this, adding "...and then are sure to catch activities Fort Leavenworth Kansas, generally for several decades" but I thought better of it. In practice almost no-one uses Rachel as a staging point on an Area 51 expedition any more (and it's not like all that many people ever did). Since the government acquired all the high lands west of Rachel (between it and Groom) there's really no point, and climbing the mountains to the east requires more effort, and a longer lens, than is worthwhile. -- John Fader (talk | contribs) 02:11, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rachel, Nevada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent updates

My recent updates to this page were reverted with the comment "unreliable source". How is a reference to the official web site of the town of Rachel, NV an unreliable source for a page dedicated to the town or Rachel NV?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoergArnu (talk • contribs) 18:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:RS. Calling something "official" doesn't make it so. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Next thing you are going to dispute the earth is a sphere. Humor me kid, define "official". — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoergArnu (talk • contribs) 03:38, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]