Talk:Parable of the Pearl

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Virginity#Catholic theology|virginity]] The anchor (#Catholic theology) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Suspected Vandalism by user Golpplog

I'm neither a hip/active user of this site nor am I a domain expert, but checking the revision history shows Golpplog seems to be vandalizing the page as of 2 days ago (June 24, 2022). "Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a merchant man" became "Again, the man ate lots of apples he was very fat like unto a merchant man," with additional mangling following in multiple edits. First diff 23.240.152.80 (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LDS

Moved discussion concerning the LDS collection of books to its new article's talk page. It took me a lot of time to find out where the LDS content had been moved. Please remember there are other editors working on these articles: Leave a note in the talk page each time content is deleted or moved. Thanks. --euyyn 14:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gospel of Thomas

Clearly this gospel, written long after the 1st century, is a copy of whatever these disciples chose to copy from other gospels, Quelle, and whatever else was floating around. The Pearl is unique to the canonical text and is merely a copy in Thomas. More importantly, if it had been only in Thomas, no one would have ever heard of it, nor would it be quotable, because it lay buried for so long. Even if it were the original, it wouldn't be important! Student7 (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]