Talk:New Naturalist

Expansion

This entry could benefit with being expanded. The New Naturalist is one of the most collected series of books in the UK.

Clean up

{{cleanup}} done. Dunc|☺ 22:52, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ford's Butterflies.jpg

Image:Ford's Butterflies.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

• I have edited Image:Ford's Butterflies.jpg to add the relevant information. It would be a shame if this image was deleted! Snalwibma 10:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Editions

I've added edition dates for Ford's Butterflies and some of the Blooomsbury facsimiles. Please add more. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 23:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

De-clutter Main Series Table?

In order to de clutter main series table I recommend moving the hardback and paperback ISBN information to their own columns, thus (example):

Number	Title	Author	Editions	Bloomsbury Edition	ISBN (HB)	ISBN (PB)
119	Scotland	Peter Friend	05/01/2012		978-0-00-730956-6	978-0-00-730906-6
120	Grasshoppers and Crickets	Ted Benton	05/06/2012		978-0-00-727723-0	978-0-00-727724-7
121	Partridges: Countryside Barometer	G. R. Potts	27/09/2012		978-0-00-741870-1	978-0-00-741871-8

User:Simuliid 18 Oct 2012

Hi Simuliid, sorry you think this a major change. I think in a way the table you've put above says it all - the ISBNs add very little for the reader, and as they are edition-specific, they go out of date very readily (all it seems to take is a simple reprint nowadays). Further, only the most recent books (with a couple of exceptions) had them, so frankly it wasn't helping a lot, and yes, it was cluttering the place up. With the additional columns it won't be a lot better, surely. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

And on dates, it is very unusual to have dd/mm/yyyy for books in Wikipedia. We nearly always make do with yyyy. Can't see why we need them here, either.

And while we're on critique mode, the 'Bloomsbury' column is nearly all empty. Perhaps we could just have a small "B" symbol (superscript, perhaps) against the books which have one of these? Would save a wide strip of 'real estate'. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

I see that this has not been resolved a year on. I propose to make the following small changes to declutter the table, unless there are genuine reasons why the current inconsistent and 'recentist' (sales-oriented?) arrangement is necessary:

1) trim book dates down to year - all but the most recent are like that already

2) remove the ISBNs from the more recent books - readers can find them instantly on Amazon, and they mess up the whole table. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Author link

I have added links to the author's biographies for all authors. I should add that the authors are now listed as they are on the cover of the books. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

I have removed, and I will remove, links to disambiguation pages that are unsolvable. Red links are fine but link to disambiguation pages not. Sorry. The Banner talk 22:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Naturalist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704132143/http://www.britishbookawards.org/shortlist.html to http://www.britishbookawards.org/shortlist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

None of the external links to internal pages of the official website actually work anymore - the pages no longer exist. I've removed all of the broken links Harasseddad (talk) 23:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)