Talk:Edward B. Titchener

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This is the best way I could explain structuralism to someone who knew little about psychology whoever edits the page see if you can keep my explaination I think its pretty good all things considered. GrazingshipIV 04:09, Mar 11, 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps it should be noted that Titchener changed his views in the latter part of his life (according to my text book). However, I do not have a direct citation. SiriusAlphaCMa 06:16, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was his nationality really Indian, as the page currently reads? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.234.73.131 (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Going more in-depth on his ideas

I think this article should contain fully his laws of attention and a little bit more on structuralism. Structuralism one of the big things he is remembered for. While it definitely would not supplant the structuralism page, I think it would enrich the reader's experience. Mckayreedmoore (talk) 01:36, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

I added a citation for the assertion that Margaret Washburn was the first woman to get a PhD in Psychology. Mckayreedmoore (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]