Talk:Nile perch
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Hello, I just followed the link to "Nile tilapia" at the bottom of the page and that describe said species as a "Perciform". However the linked page Nile_tilapia is described as a "Cichlid"? I'm no expert but would like to point out the discrepancy. User:Dragon.jade 2 Jan 2018 —Preceding undated comment added 06:49, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
I just undid some vandalism, sorry if I did it wrongly 81.90.168.59 (talk) 16:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Aren't Lake Rudolph and Lake Turkana the same thing? -- Walt Pohl 03:09, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Some good info on nile perch here, if someone is looking to expand the article. Suppafly 22:08, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
In east Africa, the terms "nile perch" and "tilapia" are use interchangeably. Should this relationship be referenced here?
- Added that info - also at Nile tilapia. Dysmorodrepanis 12:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
incomplete/unclear sentence: Darwin's Nightmare is highly controversial...
[edit]"Darwin's Nightmare" is highly controversial, however, to those who consider the introduction of Nile perch beneficial. They accuse the documentary of deliberately implying causalities that do not actually exist. Even among critics of the introduction, the focus on spectacular but only loosely correlated recent issues - the neglect of the actual ecologic and economic upheaval caused by L. niloticus proliferation in Lake Victoria - most of which happened in the 1960s and 1970s prior to introduction.
Is it just me or is this sentence incomplete and unclear? I can't complete the sentence but here's a clean up of the text:
To those who consider the introduction of Nile perch beneficial "Darwin's Nightmare" is highly controversial. They accuse the documentary of deliberately implying causalities that do not exist as well as the criticising its focus on spectacular but only loosely correlated recent issues.
I cannot figure out what the second half says, and maybe even the last sentence of my edited version should be deleted as it is not backed up by examples. Moaltmann (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree that last sentence is a bit unreadable, I went to the discussion page to see if there were more clues. The bit "...most of which happened in the 1960s and 1970s prior to introduction." I didn't quite get either. Prior to the introduction of the fish? I thought the article says they were introduced in the 1950s, so that would be after, wouldn't it? You could probably shorten the sentence then put a citation needed marker on it.
Rentrustic (talk) 09:44, Wednesday, 21 January 2009 (ACST) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC).
hes doesnt want her out ther alone now i dont wanna be inlove! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.2.17.139 (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Have added "to the" instead of the dash. IONO whether he editor actually wanted to say this, but having followed the Lates case as well as the brouhaha around the movie, it seems accurate: native fishermen and foreign biologists alike noted that something big was going on there, long before Russian cargo planes did or did not do telegenic weapons-for fillet'o'fish round trips.
- In a nutshell, what had happened in the 1960s/1970s was that the local human population got displaced from its place at the top of the lake's trophic web by L. niloticus. The lakeshore residents had used the lake's cichlids as mainstay protein source for millennia, and this balance was upset within half a generation. The movie focuses on the consequences which are so-so - and hence the movie has to dramaticize to make its point. The process that led to these consequences was crass enough to require no such exaggeration. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nile perch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041211060628/http://www.iucn.org/info_and_news/press/alien2001.html to http://www.iucn.org/info_and_news/press/alien2001.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
from horizontimes.com
[edit]"The Nile Perch was first introduced to Lake Victoria in 1954. It was used as a way to counteract the drop in native fish caused by over-fishing. It was actually counterproductive and caused the extinction of more than 200 fish species! Yikes!" Carlm0404 (talk) 19:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)