This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1st millennium BC article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2011

Egyptian pharaohs

Why are there so many Egyptian pharaohs on the list of important people. Many don't even have proper wiki articles. I understand that pharaohs where important but their are more Egyptian pharaohs on this list then everybody else combined.meitme (talk) 01:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.worldtimelines.org.uk/world/americas/1000-200BC
- In 1st millennium BC on 2011-05-25 06:55:13, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
- In 1st millennium BC on 2011-06-10 04:35:54, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.worldtimelines.org.uk/world/americas/200BC-AD600
- In 1st millennium on 2011-05-25 06:55:13, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
- In 1st millennium on 2011-06-10 04:33:43, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2009

BCE instead of BC

Current language should use BCE instead of BC, why does everything refer to BC instead? -brill (talk) 02:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1st millennium BC: almost all references are Harts personal opinions

This is an important article, isn't it? Spanning 1000 years of history. However, almost all of the references are about one author's personal opinions on who was how influential. I think Wikipedia deserves better than that. IMO one should either delete all those references to Hart's list, or create Wikipedia articles for alternative lists (some of them listed below), and add links from famous persons to those alternative lists, too. Otherwise the Wikipedia information on the 1st millennium BC will reflect inappropriate bias towards Hart's personal opinions.

A top 10 list at http://www.faqs.org/shareranks/1338,Most-Influential-People-of-All-Time : 1 Manu (Shanker Mishra), 2 Einstein, 3 Socrates, 4 Aristotle, 5 Plato, 6 Newton, 7 Lao Tzu, 8 Moses, 9 Darwin, 10 Franklin.
A Japanese top 10 list http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/04/01/historys-100-most-influencial-people-hero-edition-video/ : 1 Sakamoto Ryoma, 2 Napoleon I, 3 Oda Nobunaga, 4 Saigo Takamori, 5 Miyamoto no Yoshitsune, 6 Jean of Arc, 7 Hideyoshi Toyotomi, 8 Albert Einstein, 9 Yutaka Ozaki, 10 Akechi Mitsuhide.
A top 7 list http://www.rateitall.com/t-1283-most-influential-people-in-world-history.aspx : 1 Jesus Christ, 2 Muhammad, 3 Adolf Hitler, 4 Ronald Reagan, 5 Albert Einstein, 6 Buddha, 7 Johann Gutenberg.
LIFE magazine's top 10 list http://www.smccd.edu/accounts/goth/MainPages/100_most_important_people.pdf : 1 Edison, 2 Columbus, 3 Luther, 4 Galileo, 5 Leonardo, 6 Newton, 7 Magellan, 8 Pasteur, 9 Darwin, 10 Jefferson.
Several lists are topped by Gutenberg, e.g.: http://www.falls.igs.net/~dphillips/biography3.htm
Another top 10 list http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=173626 : 1 Mohammed, 2 Aristotle, 3 Tsai Lun, 4 Johann Gutenberg, 5 Jesus of Nazareth, 6 Paul of Tarsus, 7 Shih Huang Ti, 8 Louis Pasteur, 9 Plato, 10 Siddhartha Guatama.
Yet another list found on the web: 1 Mitochondria Eve, 2 Jesus, 3 Mohammed, 4 Columbus, 5 Confucius, 6 Darwin, 7 Sun Yat-sen, 8 Karl Marx, 9 Buddha, 10 Rousseau.
Some of the numerous additional lists of this kind:
http://www.the-top-tens.com/lists/most-influential-person-of-all-time.asp
http://www.worldtop.org/Culture/People/Most+influential+people+ever/
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_are_the_25_most_important_people_in_history
http://www.historum.com/showthread.php?t=2971

Gimmemoretime (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- I think I was the editor who added the reference to Hart's work. I intended it as a starting point from which I hoped other editors would offer contributions. -ErinHowarth (talk) 22:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2007

Span?

I guess the first millennium B.C. is supposed to be from 1000BC to 1BC. If this, or something else, is intended it would seem best to state it clearly. ~~reader —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.191.202.88 (talk) 22:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

2006

Japan

Shouldn't the foundation of Japan be added? Japan was, according to thier histories, founded on February 11, 660 B.C. This is an important event, as Japan lasted through the ages, beyond Egypt and Rome, become a powerful nation-state in the late 1860s, and a world power less than thirty years later. -Alex, 12.220.157.93 10:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2005

Alphabet

The Phoenicians develop and propagate the alphabet

We aren't that sure about the alphabet, are we? 203.162.3.147 05:26, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Collages

It appears an RFC on collages on Wikiproject years will be interpreted to also ban collages in millenia articles. Users here may wish to participate. Koopinator (talk) 08:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]