User talk:Mahemoff

Nomination of The new for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article The new, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The new until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PubSubHubbub

The article PubSubHubbub has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are no indepedent sources on this to give it notability in an encyclopaedic setting.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 10:45, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bloom filter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Cancelled AFL matches

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely a list. It only has one valid entry, with a partial postponement and a pre-season practice match being included for padding. Even if there were more items, fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Aspirex (talk) 08:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only a small list, and barely notable. MasterMind5991 (talk) 10:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if these are genuinely the only matches that have ever been cancelled, then an article on the topic definitely isn't warranted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:LISTN, have been unable to find anything (except this article and mirrors), that covers this subject as a whole, only hits that discuss individual cancellations (btw heres another one? - AFL game between lions and hawks). Coolabahapple (talk) 06:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- only three entries and trivial topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Proposed deletion of Apache Shindig

The article Apache Shindig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSOFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]