Talk:John Williams

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Williams article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 180 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance).

United States: Music Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Composers

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

Indiana Jones (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana Jones, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Indiana JonesWikipedia:WikiProject Indiana JonesTemplate:WikiProject Indiana JonesIndiana Jones articles

Star Wars Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Novels: Harry Potter Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Harry Potter task force (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other talk page banners

A separate section for collaborations with Steven Spielberg and George Lucas ?

In Steven Spielberg and George Lucas's Wikipedia Articles, they each have a section regarding their collaboration with Williams. Can, must, and should we do the same for Williams's Wikipedia Article? Because I would assume that Williams's work with Spielberg and Lucas is one of the biggest if not the biggest and most important aspect of Williams's career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:CF80:7440:39BF:8A50:657A:405D (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image

The Image that I changed for the infobo was from 2009 and it was reverted to the 2007 image. Why was it reverted when I updated the image to a newer image?MasterD.D. Patel (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not my reversion, but probably because the newer image was a poor image. Canterbury Tail talk 14:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Johns Williamses

Given that both are musicians famous in large part via film work, should there perhaps be a somewhat more elaborate hatnote mentioning John Williams (guitarist) in particular? And/or a mention of the other JW in the body of the article? 109.255.211.6 (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding film score to genres.

It's not a genre. Any genre can be used as a film score. CompletePerson (talk) 08:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Accidental Tourist

Your article did not even mention the movie, The Accidental Tourist, 1988, for which John Williams wrote the music, and is one of his loveliest scores. 108.30.157.194 (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Alexcalamaro (talk) 08:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Want to also acknowledge his work on Fitzwilly (1967)? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitzwilly

No, I don't know if this counts as one of the loveliest of his scores, but he did release a CD of it. 156.99.95.253 (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Have always thought this was a terrible photograph of JW. Anything that could replace it? Dlh9690 (talk) 17:00, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth

Is this Variety article [1] sufficient to support his date of birth? —C.Fred (talk) 17:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can link several articles where February 8, 1932 is listed. Frankly I am surprised this is even a discussion, it has always been publicly known and accepted as the correct date. Why is this even coming up?

Article to confirm: On his 90th birthday, here's John Williams conducting the Boston Pops

Famous birthdays for Feb. 8: John Williams, Robert Klein - UPI.com

Fans Wish John Williams A Happy 90th Birthday: 'Without John Williams (theblast.com)

February 8: Happy Birthday John Williams and James Dean – Lebeau's Le Blog (lebeauleblog.com)

‎John Williams' 90th Birthday February 8, 2022 | IMDb Community Forums (sprinklr.com)

JOHN WILLIAMS 90TH BIRTHDAY SPECIAL - PART ONE - Cinematic Sound Radio Podcast

Edmonton Symphony Orchestra celebrates John Williams’ 90th birthday | CTV News

John Williams: Compositions, movies, age and awards revealed - Classic FM

HAPPY 90th BIRTHDAY, MAESTRO! – JOHN WILLIAMS Fan Network – JWFAN

Celebrating the music of John Williams: from ‘Jaws’ to ‘Star Wars’ to ‘Harry Potter’ and more – WABE

John Williams at 90: ‘He is so much smarter than his critics’ | Film | The Guardian 2604:3D09:6A85:6000:5482:22DE:FA82:ED9B (talk) 18:07, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why the birthdate was removed, we already had a cite to the New York Times article in Feb 2022[2] about his 90th birthday. In any event cites now appear right after the introductory mention of his birthday.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 20:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone needs to discuss removing the birthday again, including Toddst1 let's please discuss here first! We need to consider the reader's experience here, and the wanton removal of birthdates that are quite verifiable degrades the user experience of the reader. I am sure there are thousands of BIO articles that just have birthdates slipped in there without any easy means of verification but this is not one of them.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, what does the first sentence of WP:SYN say?

WP:BLPREMOVE and WP:DOB trump any "reader's experience" and you should know that. That's why BLPREMOVE is exempt from 3RR. Toddst1 (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddst1: So, what's the failing of the Variety article? —C.Fred (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: The Variety article wasn't cited and I hadn't seen your comment above. Sorry I missed that.Toddst1 (talk) 01:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am boggled at your behavior, Toddst1. This was easily verifiable information and we need good editors like you improving articles not running around making work for me, even if i was once named the best of all editors of all time.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 20:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Milowent: I'm really sorry to hear that not only do you completely misunderstand WP:SYN, but you think the WP:BURDEN to provide sources is on me? You might need to understand WP:BLPREMOVE as well. My edit summary was pretty clear. Read more policy, bark less opinion. Toddst1 (talk) 01:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddst1: Jumping in late here but how is this WP:SYNTHESIS? –CWenger (^ • @) 01:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources didn't state his date of birth. The editor combined sources and sections within the same source to conclude the DOB. Toddst1 (talk) 18:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that case wouldn't every infobox that calculates somebody's current age based on their birthdate be synthesis, unless there's a source that explicitly states their current age? –CWenger (^ • @) 19:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research is <- that way. Toddst1 (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My work is done here, I'm going to bow out. John Williams' birthdate has been secured for eternity.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality

I looked up this composer after seeing a live interview with him, and wondering how old he was. He's 91 at this point, still working and quite compos mentis. IMHO this article is one of the best I've seen in crowdsourced editing, with the most of any individual contributing amounting to just over 6%. The third most is just over 3%. Activist (talk) 08:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NFL on NBC

Is it really necessary to have the template NFL on NBC on the article? Perhaps, John Williams did the music for the show, but I have seen countless documentaries on Williams and the NFL was never mentioned to my recollection. It just seems way too prominent on the bottom relative to his extensive body of work in FILM.

If no one responds, I intend to delete the template. --David Tornheim (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Film Score Not Mentioned in the Article

The credits to Heidi (1968 film) call out John Williams as the composer and director of its musical score. Since his role is mentioned in the film's Wikipedia article, it is only fitting to mention it here also. 50.39.178.182 (talk) 06:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]