Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Red River Rebellion/archive1

I believe this to be an excellent example of Canadian history and growth. SD6-Agent 10:57, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Refer to Peer Review. Please hold articles against the Featured article criteria before nominating them. This article has no References, to start with; furthermore, it lacks images and headings; and I doubt if it complies with the standards of relevant Wikiprojects. I could remark a few other things, but that would be more like peer review. Thus: refer to Peer Review. — mark ✎ 11:29, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Object. A lot could be named, as above, but the most glaring problem is that it simply appears too short and not comprehensive. Everyking 12:19, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Object. Barely more than a stub. Refer to Peer Review. -- Jmabel | Talk 16:31, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
Object No way is this ready. One of my areas of interest is Canadian history, and this article has always struck me as both worthy of and in need of serious improvement. Not FAC material by a longshot. Fawcett5 22:48, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)