User talk:C00ch

a fellow seabird biologist!

I agree completely with your comments on the penguin talk page. If you ever need help or feel like taking on a major revision drop me a line. Sabine's Sunbird talk 18:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 05:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:SnaresPenguin (Mattern) large.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:SnaresPenguin large (Mattern).jpg. The copy called Image:SnaresPenguin large (Mattern).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chatham Islands Penguin

Well you didn't dig very deep on that one, no? Sources should be really easy to find (if you had asked, I would even have added them myself, but forgive me when I hand this task over to you). In general, we try to run a very tight ship on the WikiProject Birds as regards suspect information, and I think that the ornithology part of WP - not least due to contributions of people like you - is one where it really shines. As a general note, if in doubt slap a {{check}} (^{[verification needed]}) or {{cn}} (^{[citation needed]}) tag on it, or use  to out-comment text from the displayed article, or for more serious matters, {{Disputeabout|'''The topic of dispute'''}}. I do these all the time (the former three especially), and namely the "verification needed" serves the purpose well, as it alerts readers that some information is possibly in error.

And/or run a quick search on Google Scholar first and Google if the Scholar one doesn't score hits, and/or drop a line on the Birds project page (should be accessible via all bird-related Talk pages). Deleting things just so will sooner or later result in people accusing you of vandalism, though your intentions are perfectly honorable. Thanks!

PS: There are 4 sources at least, all are scientific publications, at least 2 peer-reviewed (one is a monograph and the other is too old). At least 3 should be findable via Google Scholar, 2 very easy, 1 a bit harder. The old reference must probably be tracked down by hand.

The reason why this bird does not appear in many sources is that it has not been formally described. It is very probably a new species - it is certainly neither pachyrhynchus nor sclateri, and probably not chrysocome either - , but as there is hope of DNA being recoverable, and the late prehistoric biogeography of the genus in the NZ region is not so well understood, a formal description would seem to require a bit higher hurdles to pass than in other such cases. Dysmorodrepanis 10:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:WilliamsMaltexoEngineer.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:WilliamsMaltexoEngineer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Chick guard stage

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chick guard stage , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Cynival^{Let's Chat!} 00:17, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Diphtheritic stomatitis.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Diphtheritic stomatitis.jpg, which you've attributed to Dean Nelson, Department of Conservation, New Zealand.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, C00ch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, C00ch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]