Jump to content

Talk:400-series highways

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured list400-series highways is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic star400-series highways is the main article in the 400-series highways series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on June 30, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
February 29, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
June 2, 2016Featured list candidatePromoted
September 21, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 400-series highways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overly Rosy?

[edit]

The assessment of the 400 system seems perhaps too cheery. Some items:

  • Old bridges too low on 400?
In article on 400. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • very narrow shoulders on inside lane on 400, no room for breakdown in inside lane
Source, might be in 400 article. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • a lot of bridge abutments look pretty close
Source needed. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Despite the sprawl or complexity of some interchanges, "You can't get there from here", incomplete interchanges:
    • 427 South to 401 East (have to take 409)
    • 401 East to 403
    • 403 South to QEW East
This is not really discussed in sources, nor generally an issue for traffic movement (aside from the 403-401-410 interchange in recent years with the westward expansion of the GTA. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[1]
I've got a link here, I am sure it is not considered a reliable source, but I think you can see the gist of it [2] Feldercarb (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • some exits are on left, say 401 to allen road.
Generally mentioned in individual cases, especially on 407 article. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Several freeway to freeway interchanges feature pretty tight turns (although generally lightly used) -- "cloverstacks" -- looking at you 407/410
Need a source. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • weird 410 to 10 connector
As above. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • No overall numbering system, unlike US interstate
Generally not true, nor significant for an intraprovincial network. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Interstates use even numbers for E-W routes; odd for N-S; N-S freeways generally start from low number (I5) in west and are numbered sequential. "A system". 400 series has no such ordering.
I think Quebec Autoroutes have a similar numbering plan Feldercarb (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wacky 403/QEW numbering (the 407 through Halton should have been 403) leaving the 403 non-contiguous
Discussed in both 403 and 407 articles. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • the highway from Kitchener to Guelph should have been 407, but apparently will be "new highway 7"
Not true. There has never been an official 400-series number for the planned twinning since its conception in the mid-1960s. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
exactly - it should "logically" be 407, but the planners have done otherwise Feldercarb (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Backwards" guidance signage - "QEW via 427" rather than "427 to QEW"
You need to give a reason why this is significant. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
seems backwards from what an average person might expect; eg I am looking for/expecting to get on the 427, but the sign leads with "QEW"
  • Kings Highway markers on 400 series are shown as "Crowns", but road-side markers are "Crown and shield"
The crown is the shield. Intersecting roads use the junction crown (the compressed one), nearby ones use a green crown with "to" above the number... at least that's what they are SUPPOSED to do according to the Ontario Traffic Manual. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Roadside markers have a "shield" (like a coat of arms) topped with a crown. Overhead markers use just the "crown". Two styles of marker.
In Quebec, I believe the roadside Auto-route markers are exactly the same as the over-head markers. Why does Ontario have two different styles of marker?
You can see it here: Ontario has a "guide" sign (crown only) and a route marker (crown and shield). No other province has two styles, if this website is correct. [3]
  • Wasn't the 403 touted as "death highway" for a while?
Yes, discussed in its article under "Controversy". - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Carnage alley on 401
Mentioned in the History section of the 401 article. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • 407 was investigated by PEO prior to opening for design safety
Again. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
three highways had safety issue flagged, therefore "systemic" issue, bad design Feldercarb (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • High mast lighting on 403 on one side of the road, not down the middle, in Mississauga
Significance? Likely due to light pollution mitigation because the northwest side is a hydro corridor. Need a source though. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
just poor design, my opinion -- think it was cheaper to run down one side, rather than route wires under the medianFeldercarb (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • no lighting on some urban portions of QEW and 403 in Mississauga
As above. Both answers belong in the 403 article itself. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am supposing it is a "systemic" problem in that there is no apparent standard for lighting. QEW in Oakville is lit, Mississauga is not; Toronto isFeldercarb (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • don't use reflectors or cat's eyes for lane markings
Snowplows. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • opposing centre lanes often close adjacent (no grass median) -- at night looking into oncoming headlights
Tall wall was designed to mitigate this, generally not a complaint, but please let me know if there are any sources on this! - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • no reflectors on 7West to 8South flyover bridge in Kitchener (oops freeways which aren't 400 series for some reason)
Aren't they rebuilding this? Likely temporary or unnecessary. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • might be logical to upload all freeways to province (red hill creek, the linc, gardiner, DVP), but no, we downloaded the QEW to Gardiner
Agreed, but only fantasy at this time. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is the express/collector system really effective? the 407 is 12 lanes in one section without collectors
I'm not sure, it's based on a 1960s technique. I don't believe the proximity of the transfers and exits makes it effective in comparison to say, I-271 in Cleveland (though volumes are incomparable), but that's just a personal opinion. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feldercarb (talk) 14:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Feldercarb (talk) 21:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied in indents with my signature. I don't disagree with most points, but they are subjective and require a good source to mention on any of the highway articles. More importantly, this article is just a summary of the individual articles for each highway; most of the text is a direct copy of the respective ledes for each article. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[4]

I think the idea was to indicate there are a number of "flaws" with the 400-system.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Indeed. My reply was generally to the tune of "provide some references to backup these observations and I'll work them into the article." - Floydian τ ¢ 17:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Interstate Highways in Ontario" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Interstate Highways in Ontario and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#Interstate Highways in Ontario until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:400-series_highways&oldid=1234679990"