User talk:Alex S
Hello. I hope that I am typing this in the correct area. This is my first attempt to create an article. You have deleted the article about Wildcat Theatre Company. ( 18:52, 17 May 2010 JoJan (talk | contribs) deleted page Wildcat Theatre Company (A7: Article about an eligible subject, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)) Could you please restore it in order that I, and others, can significantly add to the piece? There is an enormous archive of material about this extremely important entity, which played a massive part in the cultural, musical, theatrical and political life of Scotland for over twenty years. Incidentally the correct name of the organisation is "Wildcat Stage Productions", although it is often, erroneously, called "Wildcat Theatre Company". Thank you Meechan100 (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
NOTICE: For ease of editing, I archive this page when it reaches 32 kilobytes, moving the first 25 comments to an archive. If you still have something to say to me about an archived subject, feel free to copy and paste it out of the archive, back onto this talk page, and continue the conversation. Archives: I, II
Hey this Kane Alexander page I created was to give people a general background of him, not to sell him. I had no idea that it would be under the category of deletion!
Thanks,
Catherine L.
What gives other people the right to block other peoples wikipedia accounts?! LIKE WHAT THE HELL!!!!! ITS CALLED THE BILL OF RIGHTTS ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!
Trigger Happy
[edit]Dear Administrator: I, like you, am an editor; I create articles and make edits. But, many, I am sure many other people out there, are tired, frustrated and angry with the behavior of many Administrators. I am certain that it is appallingly easy to revert and article, that someone has undoubtedly spent allot of time and effort writing. I have, in the past spent hours, researching, planning, writing, checking and revising an addition to an article only to have the whole lot deleted forever three minutes afterwards.
I know that deletion of material is essential in a free-to-edit encyclopedia, but if you see an article that someone has anonymously devoted their time to writing, why could you not revise it, change it or give a reason for you action? They deserve one.
I know all Administrators are not all Drunk-With- Power-Trigger-Happy-Nazis, many of you do an excellent job and you know who you are. The world owes you. I owe You.
In closing: Create, don’t Destroy. Make a distinction between “what is right, and what is easy”. Be enriched and enrich others with the knowledge of other people.
And keep that finger off the trigger.
Dfrg.msc 01:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- See my reply on your talk page. --Alex S 18:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Shawn, 21:58, 25 May 2006
[edit]- Thanks for cleaning up the Student Congress article. Great job! --Shawn 21:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
"Dreams from my Father"
[edit]Yes, this would seem to be an eminently defensible piece of fair use (especially if you discuss the cover at some point in the text). Upload it, mark it {{book cover}}, and cite the source as the Amazon page.
Incidentally, there's several editions of this book, but you only list a single ISBN. I'd suggest finding the others and listing them as well... Shimgray | talk | 21:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Hganesan, 20:59, 3 June 2006
[edit]User Simishag continuously is claiming Bucsrsafe is me when he is not. Please warn Simishag. I am very upset he is wrongly accusing me. Please tell the other admins about this. It is frustrating. Hganesan 20:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC)hganesan
W.L. Mackenzie King
[edit]I took the liberty of removing your "wikify" notice, since it was attached to a vandalized version of the article. I have reverted accordingly. Fishhead64 05:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Jerome Fisher
[edit]Thanks for cleaning up the article that was up for deletion. I've suggested a "redirect" as an option on the vote page [1].
Hey, and congrats on Yale.
Ande B. 01:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the message.
[edit]Hello. I'm actually a current student. I'm a sophmore in Davenport College and lived in Welch Hall last year, which was why I was editing it. Do you know your residential college yet? Apparently, if you log in with your net-id to www.yale.edu/facebook, whatever college facebook comes up is what college you're in. Trickedbyfoxes 18:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Thanks!
[edit]Sure, glad to help! :) Cheers, Sango123 03:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
This is homer s
[edit]I didn't mean to delete the nominations. I apologize. It was a mistake. Is there any way to bring the article back the way it was? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homer s (talk • contribs)
Banking in Switzerland
[edit]Thank you for reviewing Banking in Switzerland. I agree with your statements and will try to improve it just a bit more. Paul 04:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Your Idea for a Welcome Bot
[edit]I disagree. Many welcomers make their own messages. By receiving a message from a bot, the result is that people will not feel welcome because it is simply a message that is being repeated over and over and over again. I change my welcome messages at least once a week, so generally, my messages are different. Bots are inhuman, and people prefer to be greeted by people who are living and have a pulse and heart.
Booksworm Talk to me! 15:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
GAC info
[edit]I know what you mean, and been doing just that. Though, since I do not no anything thing about the FF serie and am not aware of the characters or everything related to that, I can't assess for the criteria #3 because I don't know if it is broad enough in its coverage. Lincher 23:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind comment's in the PR for Alison Krauss and thanks for the Good Article nod. I'm especially thankful for the note you made about it being well-referenced, as if you look at this version when I started editing it was a slow and plodding process to remove all the fancruft and reference the thing properly. Staxringold talkcontribs 02:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
You made some very helpful comments on the Alison Krauss PR, and it is currently up at FAC. A somewhat new user has lodged an objection, though IMO does not fully understand the principles of WP:WIAFA. Could you put in a vote if you have the time (whether you support or oppose the article's candidacy) just so the FAC takes a better course? Thanks! Staxringold talkcontribs 15:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for marking up your userpage last time, my mistake. I've added (and am going to continue to add to) a new "Artistry" section per Mariah Carey to encompass the various critical reviews of things. Any updated comments in the FAC would be a help, even if I don't get the job done to reverse your opinion by the end of the FAC. Thanks! Staxringold talkcontribs 22:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've made some severe additions, any further review by you would be greatly appreciated. Staxringold talkcontribs 22:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please give it a review. You've not posted on the FAC since your first opposition and the article has grown much more comprehensive and better sourced. Staxringold talkcontribs 16:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
For 'not fluent', thats 'not too shabby' - I'm sure some pedant will find something to whine about, but I think it's a job well done.Bridesmill 02:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I, for one, certainly find it good work. Let me thank you for the hard work, and give you my congratulations! Thanks!--Aldux 11:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Yale '10 represent
[edit]Hey there, thanks!! Facebook me ;)
Thanks for updating the counter on the DUU90 notice. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
WP:LEAD
[edit]I clearly understand the concept of the lead and have placed the articles on hold because the lead sections do not represent the breadth of the article. For example, the lead section will talk about the person in general with his practices and all and the article will only go through his biography without even mentioning any personal traits. I'm exaggerating a bit there, if you take a look at the lead section and the article, they don't match. Lincher 17:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
The Baden-Powell House article has been adjusted in compliance with your feedback and recommendations (highly appreciated). Would you care to adjust your opinion accordingly? Wim van Dorst (Talk) 22:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Hank Williams peer review
[edit]I noticed you contributed to the Alison Krauss Featured Article nomination. If you have time we would appreciate your input on the Hank Williams Peer Review here. Thanks for your time.--WilliamThweatt 03:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Unfinished work
[edit]I have responded to your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Unfinished work. I would greatly appreciate it if you could commment further on the FAC page. violet/riga (t) 20:47, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Good work with the rewrites - I hope that has helped to allay your problems with the article. violet/riga (t) 12:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- It seems that Raul654 decided that the nomination had gotten stale and, after many additions to the article, I have renominated it. Please take a look to see if it meets your approval. Thanks, violet/riga (t) 13:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Glen J. Miles
[edit]How does someone drop you a line,
I would have appreciated it if you had not deleted the article before telling me that you were. I spent about an hour on that article and the only copy was the one on Wikipedia.
I could have used it on another bio page.
If it is still buried somewhere in the master computer I would apprecaite being able to retrieve it,
Can you tell me how,
Phil
Fred L. Hillis
[edit]Alex whatdo ya think mate can I do a page on this guy,
does he meet the criteria
please get back to me, as I will not start on it till you let me know.
Phil
Hello User Alex S.
You have linked to the article pants which is a disambiguation page. Did you mean to link to trousers? If you would amend your link to trousers this would be much appreciated.
Thanks, Liyster 06:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Philanthropist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Philanthropist. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. — Sebastian (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Deleting Categories of Jewish Athletes
[edit]Hi. I know that this is an issue that has interested you in the past. At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion#Category:Jewish_fencers some people are suggesting that Jewish athletes, beginning with Jewish Fencers, should be deleted. I do not think that is the correct approach, or consistent with wiki policy, and thought that others might want to weigh in on the discussion. --Epeefleche 23:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Palmer Bumbing Image
[edit]The copyright on the image says the author died over 100 years ago. However, the image was created less than 100 years ago, making it physically impossible for the author to have died over 100 years ago. Watersoftheoasis 22:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Attempt to delete subcategory of Jewish athletes
[edit]Well, they are trying to delete a category of Jewish athletes again. This time, figure skaters. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_14#Category:Jewish_figure_skaters . I pointed out to the originator of the attempt that we had addressed this general issue already with the main category and with Jewish fencers, where the attempts failed (due in part to your help). Still, they insist on trying to delete this category. Any help by your weighing in on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks again. --Epeefleche 00:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)--Epeefleche 20:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Palmer Bombing image
[edit]I noticed the filename was actually "palmer bumbing", so I changed and re-uploaded it. I've changed the article links to point at the new image, and listed the old one for deletion under CSD 6 (housekeeping). Moyabrit 11:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Actually, I screwed up more then just one page. I had to ping a friend to run around behind me and fix my mistakes. Thanks for being so on the ball - I wish there was a way to search for someone so helpful when you know you've screwed up like that. Bah! Beutelmd 20:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
AFD
[edit]AfD nomination of Extrinsic value
[edit]
AfD nomination of List of sporting scandals
[edit]List of sporting scandals, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of sporting scandals satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sporting scandals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of sporting scandals during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Docg 13:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Classification of admins
[edit]Hi Alex S. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 22:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Essay (numismatics), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dreams from my father.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Dreams from my father.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Beatles' photo
[edit]No problem with you deleting "Abbey Road without The Beatles" photo (which I only made as a bit of fun) but do you know that the Abbey Road photo on your main page is actually a street in Paris? Look at The Beatles' project for an updated (and correct) version. :) --andreasegde (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
User: BanRay
[edit]Please could you or another administrator get the user BanRay to quit harrassing me. He keeps reverting my edits to the Maria Sharapova page, I think just because my vision for the article conflicts with his, and has even tried complaining to others about how my edits are "vandalism", even though they are just simple edits that I think improve the page! Obviously, I could understand him editing PARTS of the page if he disagrees, but reverting the whole thing is uncalled for imo. He has also implied that I am another user, Musiclover565 (see my discussion page) simply because me and him share similar visions for the article. I would really appreciate being able to edit in peace, without having to fear BanRay reverting them. Thank you. 92.1.182.171 (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry dear, but you do not revert 62 constructive edits without giving a good reason. If you are not a sockpuppet, which I, personally, really doubt, especially since you both come from the same town and use the same internet provider, I will remind you that Musiclover565 was banned for doing exactly the same what you are doing at the moment. And no, I haven't complained to anyone about your edits. The reason your edits are constantly reverted by other experienced editors is because they constitute nothing but vandalism. I will once again strongly recommend you to revert your edits, otherwise I will have to leave you another warning. If you still find my actions unjustified, WP:AN/I would be the best place to complain, although we both know it won't do you much good. Take care. BanRay 15:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Your first comment does not make sense. You say don't revert constructive edits without a good reason - then why have you reverted mine without providing a good reason? I highly doubt that I come from the same town as Musiclover565 (would you even be able to tell if you're not an admin?). And you did complain to Milk's Favourite Cookie about my edits.
- Again, I would appreciate it if the harrassment stopped, and you left me to make constructive edits in peace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.182.171 (talk) 15:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, I have never been in touch with Milk's Favorite Cookie, let alone complaining to him. And you are more than welcome to continue with constructive edits, reverting 64 edits to restore an old version of the page against the consensus of other editors, however, is not considered constructive. Such edits will be reverted either by me or other editors. Now please stop polluting the talk page of another editor. BanRay 21:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of The Carolinas
[edit]I have nominated The Carolinas, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Carolinas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 02:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Carolinas
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Carolinas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of The Carolinas
[edit]
Help
[edit]Could you maybe help me with getting more info for the references so it could be more visable on the NOTES Kelvin Martinez (talk) 00:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Honorific titles in popular music —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelvin Martinez (talk • contribs) 00:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]For creating the Spanish Empire page :)
Thanks for the start .
greetings--EuroHistoryTeacher (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Presumption of the GFDL on Wikibooks
[edit]I'm assuming you're the same Alex S on Wikibooks, but anyway, we're soon going to be deprecating presumption of the GFDL there. Either pick a proper license or watch your electrical diagrams get deleted. ViperSnake151 Talk 14:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
RFC: socionics
[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Socionics Tcaudilllg (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
File:View of Jerusalem (small).jpg missing description details
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
AfD nomination of Corporate scandal
[edit]Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate scandal. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Chosen people
[edit]File:View of Jerusalem (small).jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:View of Jerusalem (small).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Signing of the Declaration of Independence.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Signing of the Declaration of Independence.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Agile Sync Kanban
[edit]Greetings, you have deleted an article of mine, Agile Sync Kanban because that the matirial is from an external site: jaftalks.com, while i'm the owner of the site and the owner of the concept of Agile Sync Kanban. I sent an email containing the donation, please republish my post. thank you Jaffal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasan Jaffal (talk • contribs) 06:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles
[edit]I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.
I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.
Thank you.
Vyeh (talk) 10:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Y Lle
[edit]Hi I asked for the Y Lle page not to be deleted Y lle is a new programme on S4C which replaces Uned5
At present we only want to give limited info out I have explained this to the guy who first raised the question of if Y Lle was a legitimate page Y Lle means "the place" I would really appreciate if you could reinstall this page! It will grow I promise You Thanks in advance Mike Griffiths A little trust is needed we only started this entry at 16:00 gmt today —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikegriff (talk • contribs) 19:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Notice of change
[edit]Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
(delivered by mabdul 22:55, 3 December 2012 (UTC))
Zubair_Amin Page was deleted by you
[edit]Dear Alex, if you remember, 18:37, 16 February 2010 you have deleted the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zubair_Amin, I am looking for the content on that page if you can have access to that page in anyway, so I want to work on that page again with all rules and references, It was old time when It was not properly written, but many of the information is missing now, So I need that page, Please help in it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Likhary (talk • contribs)
File:Chapin cartoon about political parties courting the suffragette vote.gif
Add listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Add. Since you had some involvement with the Add redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Technological and industrial history of the United States, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vermont (talk) 19:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
"Slavery in the South and West" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slavery in the South and West. Since you had some involvement with the Slavery in the South and West redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. BDD (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Schools
[edit]
Template:Schools has been nominated for merging with Template:Education stages. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 08:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Schools
[edit]Template:Schools has been nominated for merging with Template:Educational years. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Photograph of skulls in Colon Cemetery
[edit]The use of the photograph of bones in the ossary of the Colon cemetery in Havana as evidence of the deaths caused by the Reconcentración policy applied by Weyler is not acceptable. It is an obvious attempt to shock the reader but the image is totally unrelated to those events. Dirdam2 (talk) 08:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)