Talk:Basic Instinct 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Basic Instinct 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: British / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Release 2006?

Ehm... Should we describe films before they are released? AN 11:42, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Why not? Dismas 09:29, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, if it is proven to exist, then pre-emptive strikes to inclusions for informational preservation should definitely be made. 4.224.249.96 03:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its a good innovation!!

The film was shot in London from April to August 2005. After being in development hell for a number of years, the film was released on March 31, 2006. The film was not as well received as its predecessor and fell short of commercial expectations. - That "number of years" I suppose is < 1, according to statement ;) --78.61.94.98 00:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

André Schneider deleted

i have to delete his entry because i don't see his name in imdb for this movie. HoneyBee 09:06, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction part deleted

Look I can understand if the statements I added were too POV and subsequently deleted but they are fact. It has been both an critical (Rotten Tomatoes 6%) and commerical failure ($5 million). The reason I also think it should be mentioned in the start as the beginning of most film pages in Wikipedia will give a short plot outline, reaction to film and certain mentions of things that are noteworthy of it. The critical and commerical aspects are quite noteworthy and in no way POV. Lummie 03:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The TOC is right below the lead, with links to both critial and commercial reactions. Saying it is a critical failure is POV, same with commercial, reading the FACTS in the reception section (ie; gross, RT rating) a reader can decide whether it is a commercial and/or critical failure based on their own judgement. Cvene64 07:53, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, it is notable, so I reworded it and put it in the lead. Hope that is ok.Cvene64 07:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have to admit it looks better. Thanks Cvene64! Lummie 09:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"promo reel" scenes - threesome, etc.

Were these scenes included in "uncut" versions of the movie released outside of the USA, or were they only ever on the promo reel? This is unclear from the text. 217.155.20.163 (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]