Talk:Railroad Tycoon

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

RT2 redirect

RT2 should not redirect here. This is an acronym that is widely used (e.g., European TV channel) and this game is not the best known use. And RT3 goes somewhere completely different so it's not consistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.8.164 (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion pack

If I recall correctly, the original RRT had a later expansion pack - I think it had South America, but I'm not 100% sure - can someone confirm that? Krupo 03:20, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)

I don't recall an expansion pack, but I'm pretty sure there was a slightly graphically improved version ('Railroad Tycoon Deluxe') which may have had South America and Africa. Kinitawowi 15:00, Sep 29, 2004 (UTC)

Yes - that's what I was thinking of. I only saw it in stores, didn't actually buy it, so that's the extent of my knowledge about it... Krupo 21:10, Sep 29, 2004 (UTC)

Screenshot

The RT3 screenshot doesn't have the interface displayed- if someone could please substitute a screenshot with the interface? 20:10, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Trademark

I have a game called Railroad Tycoon for the Apple IIe/IIc. It says it's a trademark of Spinnaker Software Corp and copyrighted 1987. It's not like the build your own railroad company game it's known as now. It's more about driving the train to different businesses, collecting materials, and driving the materials to other businesses, while keeping your coal and your money high. I could probably make scans of the box, manual, and disk, but to make a disk image for your emulators might be impossible (seeing as I don't own a 5 1/4 drive, don't know anyone who owns a 5 1/4 drive, don't know how to rip a apple disk to PC, and I'm not willing to mail it off to someone who could rip it in fear of losing it) E-mail me if you want more info or maybe the scans. kilid@hotmail.com --75.4.173.19 05:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Official Download of RT Deluxe

There is an official (legal) download of Railroad Tycoon Deluxe at http://www.2kgames.com/railroads/downloads/Railroad_Tycoon.zip or http://www.gamershell.com/download_16510.shtml. If this should be mentioned, you may add it. --Con^structor 22:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what's Sid Meier's Railroads doing here?

It's not developed by the same company, it's not a sequel in name and (IMHO) it's not a sequel in spirit since the style departs so much from the RRT 2 and RRT 3, in fact going in a very different direction with simpler economics and more micromanagement. I think information concerning Sid Meier's Railroads should be deleted from this article except for a brief note concerning its lineage. 200.103.250.149 02:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sid Meier's Railroads more economic/industry ????

"Railroads! features a variety of scenarios and trains from both North America and Europe and is more economics and industry-focused than previous editions of Railroad Tycoon."

What on earth, i, and most of the comments i have seen on railroad tycoon sites show the opposite to be true, Sid Meier's Railroads includes LESS economic/industry game play/features. Railroad Tycoon 3 has the most economic/industrial features to date, (most of the RRT community views sid's railroads as a step back words from RRT3) where on earth has this section of the article came from? danielches 05:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link error?

Under "External Links", "Railroad Tycoon 3 Official Site" seems to be a dead link. I didn't want to edit this, in case I was wrong. Anybody else get this? Halmass —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halmass (talk • contribs) 13:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganise

I think we need to reorganise the RRT articles. At the moment thee is no evidence of any coherence in the articles we have, redirects etc. I will have a look tomorrow at reorganising it; has there been any prior discussion? --John (talk) 05:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Six games in the series

Maybe I can't count, but it lists only 5 games? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Czar Kirk (talk • contribs) 22:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Railroad tycoon.JPG

The image Image:Railroad tycoon.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) SITH (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:NCVGDAB, series article has no reason to not be at base name. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support In ictu oculi (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 11:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.