Talk:Plymouth Colony

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plymouth Colony article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 180 days

Plymouth Colony is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 8, 2009.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 28, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
June 11, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
August 14, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 23, 2007, December 23, 2008, December 23, 2009, December 21, 2010, December 21, 2011, December 21, 2013, December 21, 2015, December 21, 2018, December 21, 2020, and December 21, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States: Massachusetts / Cape Cod and the Islands / History Top‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Top-importance).
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Cape Cod and the Islands (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.
	This article has been selected for use on the United States portal.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Otheus, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 5 July 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

'Native American' vs 'Indian'

@Dilidor: Please cease changing 'Native American' and 'indigenous' to 'Indian' in New England history articles as you did here. We've already discussed this at Talk:Roger Williams#"Native American" vs "Indian", etc.. The Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(ethnicities_and_tribes)#Naming_conventions:_Native,_Indigenous,_Indian,_etc. guidelines state Native American in most Wikipedia articles and categories refers to the Indigenous peoples of the United States..., so please stop pushing for your contentious preference in terminology. CoatGuy2 (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CoatGuy2: I'm sorry that you have this agenda, but I will not kowtow to it. I have already explained that historical articles use historical terminology, regardless of modern political correctness. I would also point out that the articles I am editing already use "Indian" throughout, and it is you who is insisting on changing it to something different. You have insisted with equal vehemence on using other words incorrectly, such as "emigrate" and your nonce word "escapee". I have not pursued that silly "escapee" one simply because your contentious behavior toward me is a waste of my time. But I am warning you to desist from your revert warring with me, reverting huge edits simply to change one word. —Dilidor (talk) 12:47, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would urge you to strike this comment, because it is a blatant misrepresentation of the page's edit history. This article used the terms 'Native American' and 'indigenous' prior diff to my first edits on the page on March 8 and prior to your extensive edits on March 15-16. Since March 2023, you have been making a series of bold edits censoring the terms 'Native American' and 'indigenous' from New England articles because of your personal preference, which is not grounded in Wikipedia guidelines, as well as systematically removing sourced information about the history of slavery in the New England, so I would be careful about accusing others of an agenda. I would also recommend that you consult a dictionary while making copyedits. CoatGuy2 (talk) 17:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the most recent edit includes the claim 'the Indians would ambush men working in their fields or burn sleeping families in their homes', which is not included in the Philbrick source for that paragraph. You need to provide a reliable source for this information before including it, per Wikipedia:Verifiability. CoatGuy2 (talk) 19:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dilidor: The term "Native American" is not politically correct. It's just correct. Please stop. --Jayron 32 12:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

i noticd some imfo is wron o i am changing it 2603:6011:3EF0:9260:C815:FE92:58F1:EE77 (talk) 21:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 21:51, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link fix: Deetz & Deetz 2000 (footnote 25)

The link to footnote 25 [Deetz, Patricia Scott; James Deetz (2000). "Population of Plymouth Town, County, & Colony, 1620–1690". The Plymouth Colony Archive Project. Retrieved 2008-11-12.] is broken.

The current broken link is http://www.histarch.uiuc.edu/plymouth/townpop.html

The updated working link is http://www.histarch.illinois.edu/plymouth/townpop.html Winterskunk (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]