Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitions of Palestinian occupation
Not encyclopedic. The article doesn't actually discuss "Palestinian occupation", or definitions thereof. Searching on Google, the term "Palestinian occupation" seems to be rarely used, and when used, ususally refers to an hypothetical situation where Israel would come under Palestinian occupation, or to the situation in parts of Lebanon during the civil war. The article doesn't mention any of these, but instead discusses (very briefly) the term "occupied Palestinian territories", for which we already have a better article. -- uriber 20:42, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like an idea for an article that never went anywhere. Jayjg | (Talk) 00:30, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as a potential fork. Wyss 00:37, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete concur with Uriber. Make sure everything worthy here is merged into occupied Palestinian territories before deleting. BACbKA 10:04, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like an extremely POV attempt to make out that Israel is not actually "occupying" the West Bank. This is an extreme minority view and should be represented as such in the occupied Palestinian territories article. Dr Zen 01:47, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing here worth merging with Occupied Palestinian territories. Megan1967 04:24, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - still evolving, no decent reason to delete. --Is Mise le Méas, Irishpunktom 16:48, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not encyclopedic and nothing worth merging. Carrp 17:48, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)