Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Tatum
Shameless vanity. Smoddy | Talk 22:55, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity. Inter 23:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 03:39, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity more appropriate for a user page. I love it when people write "Please do not delete this". --Deathphoenix 06:30, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as a vanity prank. Wyss 06:51, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sure this can be interpreted as being in some sort of speedy deletion criteria. No one will miss it. Call it a user test or something. -R. fiend 17:03, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Speedydelete as a newbie test page. jni 17:08, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)- While definitely deletable, it does not meet the current specific criteria for speedy deletion. You'd have the stretch the "newbie test page" well beyond its original intent to make this fit. Rossami (talk) 22:10, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- You are right about the policy, it is quite strict indeed. However, I have seen admin's stretching it well beyond the limits for articles that are more complex than this two-liner. I striked out the "speedy"-word to make my vote a normal delete since there's no consensus for my original interpretation. jni 10:29, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Hell, call it "vandalism" (which it basically is) and delete it post haste. No one will miss it, and you'll be doing Wikipedia a favor. Keeping crap like this for 5 days or more is insulting. -R. fiend 17:16, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- You are right about the policy, it is quite strict indeed. However, I have seen admin's stretching it well beyond the limits for articles that are more complex than this two-liner. I striked out the "speedy"-word to make my vote a normal delete since there's no consensus for my original interpretation. jni 10:29, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)